2002 Conference Rotorua
Champions Corner Trade Exhibitor photos recovery, reuse, revenue & reality - the SuperShed story TLA Waste Officers forum Conference People

2002 Conference - a real cracker!

The eagerly-awaited conference dinner went off with a real bang this year - after isappointed diners had feared a damp squib. Barely had our favourite compere, Jim Hopkins, finished awarding a glittering series of prizes than fire alarms deafened us all. The appearance of people in hard hats and safety jackets convinced us reluctant diners to herd outside (clutching our glasses of wine of course) to the designated safety area.
“I only SAID I wanted to go back down on the luge,” your correspondent was muttering, never for one moment thinking she’d have to live up to her words wearing a long dress and stiletto heels…. when BOOM! lifeafterwaste went up in lights and a most brilliant fireworks display took off! Beaming delegates headed back inside for dessert, thrilled with the conference team’s pizzazz (and Terry’s extensive wine list!)

The hardiest delegates of all, the local government waste officers, started their endurance event ahead of the rest of us on Tuesday (many of themeven lasted the course to the Friday!). Wednesday’s workshops were heavily subscribed this year, with the delightful Pat Armstrong from Australia’s Gould League wreaking havoc on
programmes in adjacent rooms with the shouts and galumphings of her enthusiastic environmental education participants.

 

‘My name is Reg U Later and I deal with contaminated
sites at the Tyrannic Regional Council.
Some people call me a vindictive, arrogant, nit-picky
swine, but you can call me Sir.’

 

Nearly 100 people were lured into contaminated sites by bribes of chocolate fish, prizes of wine and the opportunity to watch Robert Brodnax’s screen test for the role of Mr Norm L Fella in contest with Mr Reg U Later of the Tyrannic Regional Council (more on that workshop elsewhere in this issue). A series of hearty breakfasts got the Zero Waste and BusinessCare teams off to a great morning’s start, while the bioenergy and OSH workshops tackled some serious concerns.

Two fabulous site tours in the afternoon opened many eyes to the need and pportunities for waste minimisation - one initiative was triggered by the collision of two trucks, one removing wood waste from a site for disposal, the other bringing some in for the kiln….. a saving of many thousands of dollars in disposal and purchase costs a year resulted, as well as greatly reduced fleet management and fuel costs.

Is this why we don’t hear more about cleaner production? People are too embarrassed to tell us about their savings because they are so blindingly obvious…?
Into the champagne at last! The biggest trade exhibition yet was the venue for the conference opening, from which we were poured into buses and taken away to be led off into the mysterious redwood forest, a truly awesome venue for a feast that was much more than the promised barbeque! So good were the wine, food and company that few
of us ventured off the path between the buffet tent and the tables, regaled as we were by stories ranging from life in Fort Knox for New Zealand’s solitary gold bar, to death-defying cave dives and advice on how to survive the rigors of the WasteMINZ Conference!!

Some conference oxymorons… negative growth; yummy tofu; Australian intellectual (thank you, Jason!); business sustainability…?

Yet more mind-altering experiences awaited us the following morning with Jason Clarke’s plenary address. Challenging us to change our minds so we can change the world, Jason
traced the evolution of enthusiasm from “ I’ve got an idea!” to “That’s not my
department!” Jason’s mix of humour and insight revealed the vital role that both our dreamers and our cynics need to play in realising change. Once again, our Minister for
the Environment charmed us all (not least by the spectacle of agonised Ministry staff clutching their heads at the prospect of major departures from her speech notes!) and our very own guru, Brian Richards, spelled out in breathtaking detail a vision for rolling
out lifeafterwaste.

Practising what they preach saw Danielle Kennedy wearing 100% second hand fashion to challenge us about behaviour change, Carolyn Cox fetchingly attired in a plastic suit to raise the profile of Plastics NZ’s waste minimisation plans and Clinton Jones in full Mafioso regalia gunning down some old thinking about the waste sector.

 

lifeafterwaste - setting new fashion trends?

 

Provocative addresses by Lesley Stone, Paul Deverall and many other speakers made us think hard whether there can really be lifeafterwaste, a challenge capably taken up in Jonathan Pike’s paper on a waste company’s view of resource recovery. Awards should be given next year for all those who manage to give their paper on the last day - a handicap event after the excesses that inevitably accompany the conference dinner! The last valiant drinkers were banned from the hotel bar at 4:30 am, and the anti-hangover
properties of the hash browns were heavily in demand at breakfast.

In the final plenary session, Jim Bradley and Rob Fenwick ably summarised the conference’s findings from the lifeafterwaste workshops - yes, we want it, yes we can do it, and yes we WILL do it! Another provocative address from Jason highlighted some of the thinking skills we will need to progress lifeafterwaste, while a Q&A session with MfE’s Barry Carbon gave a muchappreciated update on new views of the Ministry, before the conference closed with more firecrackers, and ice creams all round.

Nearly 450 people made this by far the biggest WasteMINZ conference yet. Resounding congratulations to the WasteMINZ Board, the redoubtable Carole and Gael and the indispensable Maureen whose annual appearances are so welcome! With able assistance from Sandy Thomas and Peter Mittermuller and the sensational AV support team,
Dynamics, the conference was an outstanding success.

The only thing is … whatever are they going to do next year!!??!!

Clare Feeney

back

Trade Exhibitors

Champions Corner

Winner Best Written Paper

$500.00 prize money sponsored by Waste Management NZ Ltd
Sarah Gordon, Joan McSweeney and Darrell Higson
Recovery, Reuse, Revenue And Reality
The Supershed Story

Runners up Best Written Paper

$250.00 prize money each paper sponsored by Waste Management NZ Ltd
Christine Byrch, Greg Brown and Clare Feeney
Business Sustainability - A Strategic
Approach To Promoting Change

and
Patricia Blütner
Mobilising People About Hazardous
Waste - The Auckland Experience

Winner Best Trade Exhibit

Sulo

Runners up Best Trade Exhibit

PSM Industries

ONYX Group Limited

back

recovery, reuse, revenue & reality - the SuperShed story

Joan McSweeney, Business Development Manager, Darrell Higson, Business Manager Recycling Centres and SuperShed & Sarah Gordon, Publicity and Information Manager, Recovered Materials Foundation

The following is an abbreviated version of the paper presented by the RMF on its experiences in developing and managing a public service that meets these goals.

Introduction
Resource recovery, or recycling centres are not a new concept. Nowadays most refuse transfer stations and public landfills provide a drop-off area for reusable and recyclable materials. What is new is the need to maximise the economic, social and environmental outputs of these operations, the associated goals and targets some of
which can sometimes be in conflict with each other.

Planning and Design to Achieve Targets
Joan McSweeney
The first Resource Recovery Centre (RRC) for Christchurch was set up as part of the new refuse transfer station in 1981 to service the southern suburbs of the City. Transfer stations with RRC’s were set up for the eastern and northern suburbs in ’84 and ’86 respectively. At the RRC’s the general public could drop-off reusable and recyclable items at no charge. In 1992 there was little monetary incentive for the public to use these areas except for the environmental good. The key focus for the staff was on scrap metal, whole bottles and reusable items recovery.

The people who frequented the centres to purchase reusable items were predominantly secondhand dealers.
Staff purchases were not restricted and some had relationships with dealers and
outside business interests. By 1998 the RRCs were difficult to operate. Revenue
had dropped with the advent of imported bottles, the customers fought and argued with staff over who was getting the best deals, staff required a lot of supervision, the money handling system was not secure, theft was obvious, and then the Asian crisis hit
home and metal prices plummeted. The RRC’s were operating at a net cost over
proceeds of $130,000 per year.

In June 1998 the RMF secured a contract with the Christchurch City Council to manage the operation of the RRC’s using current staff and budget. Our primary focus was to
increase revenue from the centres whilst increasing the volume of materials
diverted from the wastestream and maximizing employment opportunities.
In order to achieve this, an initial study made two key recommendations. Firstly
to focus more on the reusable whole goods recovery and secondly, to clearly
separate the recovery and retailing functions of the centres.

We decided to adopt the model for the Logan Recycling Market, (south of Brisbane) to set up a centralised retail outlet for recovered reusable items. Moving the retail outlet away from the RRC allowed a greater focus to be put on materials recovery, which is a more site dependant function than a retail shop. This also freed up both space and
staff time to assist more cars and trailers to pull in and drop off materials quickly
and conveniently.

Having one centralised retail outlet provides consistency in pricing, servicing and displaying goods in one locality. It also places a greater emphasis on actively marketing the materials as, once they have been transported acrosstown, it is simply not economic to store, or eventually discard them.

Finding the right premises was essential. As a retail operation, it needed to be accessible to most customers by being on a bus route and having adequate parking.

Obtaining a resource consent to operate the SuperShed in a residential area was a very long process. A resource consent to operate the SuperShed was finally granted with stringent conditions, the main one being that all materials delivered to the site could only come from the refuse stations.

From the first report on the current operation of the RRC’s in 1998, to further
investigation, planning and working on resource consents, recruitment and changes to staffing structures, it all came together and the SuperShed was officially opened on October 1 2000.

Operational Issues
Darrell Higson
The biggest daily issue is having to choose between what is realistically reusable and what we would all like to see diverted from the wastestream. Quite simply - items diverted from the waste stream must sell, if they don’t they take up valuable space and prevent other items from being offered.

Similar to many retail establishments, issues relating directly to customers are
important and can range from dealing with valid customer complaints to rude abusive customers, shoplifters, people trying to con staff, second hand dealers, answering customer queries and dealing with unruly children.

We are not second hand dealers. We deal with waste materials that wouldotherwise be landfilled and consider this operation to be the last option for these materials. We do not purchase items, and support and encourage other options to dispose of unwanted goods eg: garage sales, charity shops, advertising in “Buy, Sell and Exchange” before taking them to the Recycling Centres.

As both an employer and a retailer, we deal with a range of legal requirements.
Health and Safety issues are a major consideration. These include general issues like lifting and carrying, to more specific ones such as handling hazardous waste and even used syringes.

As with other retail outlets we must comply with numerous pieces of legislation including the Consumer Guarantees Act and therefore do not sell a number of items that could be classified as hazardous unless checked by a competent agency, including
gas bottles, gas BBQs, chemicals, prams, cots, crash helmets, life jackets and diving equipment.

Another issue is the requirement for a second hand dealer license. This has been a long drawn out issue, but on legal advice it has been determined that this is not
required as we do not “trade” (ie: buy and sell), items but deal with those only destined for landfill.

Marketing and Promotion
Sarah Gordon
Prior to developing the marketing plan we undertook comprehensive market research on the public perception and use of the recycling centres to both drop-off goods and purchase recovered items. A key finding was that many people did not understand the term “ Resource Recovery Centre”. Although a technically correct term, it seemed to
have strong associations with some sort of industrial process. The first step in giving the whole area a face lift was the rename them “Recycling Centres” (RC’s) which was an easier term that everyone could understand, not to mention say or abbreviate.

Upgrading Drop-off Facilities
We upgraded the appearance of these centres in conjunction with the introduction of the waste management unit’s domestic trailer weighing. The message “Sort and Save” was a useful tool to encourage people to drop offrecyclable materials prior to going
through to the refuse station. Staff were made more identifiable with red overalls,
and this look was carried through to the SuperShed as well.

Focus on Demand more than Supply
So much for the drop-off side of the operation - its all very well to recover materials, but its not much use if they have no markets. In our first year of setting up the SuperShed, our focus was to increase demand for the reusable goods dropped off at the RC’s which in turn would incentivise recovery facilities and service.

As the SuperShed was a new operation, we kept promotion low key in the first four months to allow for any problems to be identified and resolved. Over this period our initial target market was the existing customers of the RC’s. Once we had amassed good stocks of items and understood the turn-around time for materials, resolved any public safety, security and health and safety issues, dealt with the legalities, staffing
requirements etc, we started a more intensive campaign to raise the profile of the SuperShed.

Our message was kept very simple with the key objective for everyone in Christchurch to know of its existence as a source of quality reusable goods within 18 months. We did not dilute this with any messages about waste reduction. We believed that the SuperShed should work as a second hand retail outlet in its own right without having to play the environmental card to encourage peopleto visit and purchase items from
there. Customers’ principal motive is a bargain purchase. Unfortunately the environmental feel-good factor is secondary to this.

The initial focus was on changing the perception of these materials. We targeted women, as up until then, they were not a major user of the RC’s to purchase goods (and who would take their family to the refuse station to shop?) Also a lot of the materials recovered such as kitchenware never moved from the RC’s and would
eventually end up back in the refuse pit. The new SuperShed image was on convenient access with clean, sorted and tested materials, and just a little bit retro and different.

Secondary Focus on Supply
Now that we have a good customer base, increasing sales, and the SuperShed is a credible established retail outlet, we will have a stronger emphasis on the Recycling Centres to drop off materials for reuse and recycling. This is linked to the waste minimisation message and encouraging people to think more creatively about using
these resources.

Results to Date
Darrell Higson
Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) for the SuperShed include increasing sales revenue each subsequent year (to measure economic effectiveness), increased tonnage diverted to the SuperShed; decreased refuse from both the recycling centre and SuperShed operations; and the number of direct and indirect sustainable jobs created.
In line with our TBL philosophy our main guiding principles are to:

  1. Increase diversion of materials from
    the wastestream to viable end uses
  2. Develop more sustainable
    employment opportunities in the
    recovered materials industry
  3. To operate as a business, to at
    least breakeven, and any surplus
    revenue to be used in furthering
    reuse and recycling initiatives and
    services for the city.

There are trade-offs between these three main principles. For example: maximising
recovery of materials (including those that do not sell well) against maximising
revenue; increased employment against higher operating costs; maximising
access to materials through the SuperShed with higher operating costs as opposed
to having retail outlets at the three recycling centres which cost less to operate.
Although we are constantly juggling these values, we have clear targets to increase materials diversion, employment and revenue each year.

Materials Diversion
As we are now moving all reusable materials to the SuperShed for sale, we are able to weigh and monitor the impact of this operation both in terms or weight and volume. These items are stacked into 20 foot shipping containers for transport to the
SuperShed. As we are charged a set rate per container movement, there
is a strong emphasis on ensuring the goods are efficiently and safely stacked in the containers. Records of each container weight and safe loading are maintained to give feedback to the staff at the recycling centres. Table 1 summarises the number of
containers and net weight of materials transported to the SuperShed in the 2001/02 financial year.

Revenue from the SuperShed
Graph 1 shows the net monthly revenue generated initially through retail sales at the three RC’s combined up until October 2000, and then the monthly revenue generated by the SuperShed operation after this time. (These figures are after GST have been deducted) It must be noted that this graph shows only the net revenue from sales, less GST. Operating costs and net surplus are not included. At the end of 01/02 financial year the SuperShed operation had generated a net surplus of $43,000.

Sales by Product and Price
While we would like to maximise profits, we need to be careful that items are priced fairly. In monitoring this, we take our average daily takings, and divide this by the number customer transactions, and then work out the monthly average.

The average number of customers purchasing goods per day in 01-02 was 305. These customers spent an average $10.84 on their purchases, including GST. We aim to keep the average price per customer transaction to under $12. This is a useful measurement to ensure that goods are not overpriced, and so ensures that we provide fair and equitable access to resources for the majority of people.

Employment Generation
In 1998, when the RMF took over the management of the RC’s, a maximum of two people were employed at each of the three stations involved in both recovery and retail functions, seven days a week. Usually there was only two at the RC’s over the weekends, and during the week staff were directed to other functions with the refuse station.

Now the Recycling Centres and the SuperShed operations have 29 full-time employees, 2 permanent part-time staff and up to 10 casual workers who relieve during the
holidays and when short staffed. All these positions are fully funded through the operation of the SuperShed. In addition to this, there are two full-time indirectpositions created through the transfer of materials and testing of electronic goods.

Conclusion
The RMF upgraded the service and operation of the Recycling Centres with the key goals to increase diversion of materials from the wastestream, maximise employment opportunities and also to run the centres more cost effectively. Some of the goals
can be in conflict with each other, especially in terms of maximising profit against employment and providing equitable access to materials. We have established a range of methods to monitor these outcomes, with the targets to increase each of these outputs in subsequent years. When it comes down to it, this is what reuse
and recycling are really all about.

back

TLA Waste Officers forum

Tuesday 5 November
Convened at the WasteMINZ Conference 2002

The TLA Waste Officers Forum is the only opportunity for council waste officers from around the country to meet on a national basis. With the prospect of travelling on Tuesday to attend the Wednesday workshops, the forum on the Tuesday afternoon
provides a good opportunity for people to catch up and commence the conference in a low-key manner. This year between 50 to 60 people attended and a range of items were discussed.

Sharing of Information
In particular it is important to find out what is happening in other locations and share information that people have, so that repetition may be avoided. A quick verbal update on happenings around the country was provided by those attending the
forum.

To provide more detailed information on where councils are at with their solid waste management, one of the following people will contact respective councils for further information. Some of the information will be generic and this will be publicly available, whilst some will be confidential and only available to council staff.
Thank you to the following people who will be helping gather the information :
Jan Burbery : Northern councils
Mike Baker : Central councils
Brian Gallagher : Southern councils

NZ Waste Strategy and lifeafterwaste
Charles Willmott from the Ministry for the Environment said that to date only 9 TLA’s have formally adopted the NZ Waste Strategy. The Strategy has not been adopted by some councils for various reasons. For example, some councils may agree with only
parts of the Strategy and therefore have not adopted the Strategy as a whole. Some parts of the Strategy lack clarity and there is a lack of legislative requirements.
Paddy Gresham from the Ministry for the Environment is working on a legislative review for Part XXXI of the Local Government Act which addresses waste management and in
particular the relationship of the act to the waste strategy.

Waste Plans, Levies and Operator Licensing
There was general support for a national model waste management plan. This should not be a plan with prescriptive conditions, but a guideline that allows for the diversity of the various TLA’s.

Considerable discussion ensued about levies. Why set a levy? A landfill levy could be used to fund the lifeafterwaste programme. This would require national co-ordination. Levies collected in regions or areas should be returned to those areas for use and
not swallowed up into a consolidated fund? There was support for specific product levies to fund recycling programmes, e.g. oil, tyres.

The initial drive to license operators is for better waste data, OSH requirements, performance, cross boundary issues and support for waste management plan objectives. It will be beneficial for the waste industry to have national consistency
in establishing the parameters for licensing waste operators.

Supermarket Bags
Stuart Gane from Manukau City has been working with the Auckland Waste Managers and Foodstuffs New Zealand on introducing reusable cloth bags for supermarkets. Sold for $2, sales are exceeding expectations and this concept could be rolled out
nationally.

Relationship of TLA’s and Regional Councils
The Ministry for the Environment is considering whether there should be a greater role for regional councils and solid waste management Robert Brodnax, Gary Bedford, Darren Patterson and Guy Sowry from the Regional Waste Officers provided an update on the level of involvement from the Bay of Plenty, Canterbury, Taranaki and Waikato Regional Councils.

There were differing opinions whether Regional Councils or TLA’s should be driving regional waste management. Again there are different priorities for various regions. There were also comments about forming unitary authorities and a separate “EPA”
(Environmental Protection Agency). Like most issues with waste, it is going to take time to sort this all out!

The problems of the country were crammed into 4 hours that went very quickly. We have got all the answers but just need to agree on what ones will work and when they will be put into place!! No doubt this discussion will go on for years to come………
However we managed to adjourn to Lewishams café to revitalise the mind body and soul and kick off what was a most successful conference. Thank you to the people that attended the forum. We look forward to seeing you next year.

Cheers
Brian Gallagher, Forum Convenor

back

Conference People

WasteMINZ Conference 2003 - Click here for details

back

 


website by InfoAge